Benjamin Young

22 papers receiving 181 citations

Peers

Benjamin Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 53
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 71
  • Clinical Psychology 82
  • Mathematical Physics 33
  • Statistics and Probability 25
Replace Suzanne Larson with:
Suzanne Larson United States
David Bruce Cohen United States
Xiaomin Li Hong Kong
James H. Straughan United States
Nigel R. O’Brian Australia
Paul Turner United Kingdom
Lynn Gordon Australia
Adrienne D. Woods United States
Roger A. Johnson United States
Gustav Theodor Fechner Germany
Benjamin Young relative to Suzanne Larson United States Suzanne Larson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×26.5×
Suzanne Larson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Young. The network helps show where Benjamin Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Young Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200847
2 201033
3 199518
4 200918
5 201713
6 201412
7 200912
8 201411
9 20099
10 20038
11 20158
12 20144
13 20114
14 20193
15 20122
16 20212
17 20261
18 20101
19 20141
20 20151

About Benjamin Young

Benjamin Young is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Social Psychology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (9 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (5 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (5 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (3 papers) and semigroups and automata theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (53 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (71 citations), Clinical Psychology (82 citations), Mathematical Physics (33 citations) and Statistics and Probability (25 citations). Benjamin Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ellie L. Young, Michael J. Richardson, K. Richard Young, Paul Caldarella, Hugo de Lasa, Julie A. Nelson, Gregory A. Cox, Nicholas Proudfoot, Daniel Panario and Kurt Johansson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth, The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, Advances in Mathematics and Alzheimer s & Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact