Benjamin Viernes

22 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Benjamin Viernes
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Health Information Management 18
  • Clinical Psychology 78
  • Social Psychology 53
  • General Health Professions 60
  • Health Informatics 3
Replace Abdullah Alharbi with:
Abdullah Alharbi Saudi Arabia
Rashmi Kundapur India
Laura Simon United States
Aviva G. Nathan United States
Azar Kazemi Iran
Enzo Yaksic United States
Jiaojiao Ren China
Stephen Wagner United States
Shuduo Zhou China
Mariali Palacios-Cruz Mexico
Benjamin Viernes relative to Abdullah Alharbi Saudi Arabia Abdullah Alharbi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Abdullah Alharbi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Viernes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Viernes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Viernes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Viernes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Viernes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Viernes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Viernes. The network helps show where Benjamin Viernes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Viernes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Viernes Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Viernes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202147
2 201936
3 202130
4 202028
5 202123
6 202116
7 202013
8 201910
9 201610
10 202010
11 20218
12 20207
13 20195
14 20214
15 20204
16
Extraction of Vital Signs from Clinical Notes.
20153
17 20193
18 20193
19 20201
20
The Super Annotator: A Method of Semi-Automated Rare Event Identification for Large Clinical Data Sets.
20161

About Benjamin Viernes

Benjamin Viernes is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (2 papers) and Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (18 citations), Clinical Psychology (78 citations), Social Psychology (53 citations), General Health Professions (60 citations) and Health Informatics (3 citations). Benjamin Viernes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Kristine E. Lynch, Scott L. DuVall, Paul A. Dennis, Jennifer A. Sumner, Chi‐Hong Tseng, Patrick R. Alba, Jean C. Beckham, Ramin Ebrahimi, John R. Blosnich and A. Laurie Shroyer. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Health Issues, JAMA Network Open, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Health Services Research and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact