Benjamin Viernes

23 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Benjamin Viernes
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Health Information Management 14
  • Clinical Psychology 56
  • Social Psychology 38
  • General Health Professions 38
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 5
Replace Daniel Roellinger with:
Daniel Roellinger United States
Nazrila Hairizan Nasir Malaysia
Karl Emmert-Fees Germany
Shaheer Ellahi Khan Pakistan
Ivan Ricardo Zimmermann Brazil
Christine Kersting Germany
Shishir Paudel Nepal
Paranee Vatanasomboon Thailand
Gabriella Lawrence Israel
Hyun Bae Yoon South Korea
Benjamin Viernes relative to Daniel Roellinger United States Daniel Roellinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Daniel Roellinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Viernes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Viernes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Viernes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Viernes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Viernes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Viernes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Viernes. The network helps show where Benjamin Viernes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Viernes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Viernes Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Viernes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202152
2 201938
3 202132
4 202028
5 202125
6 202118
7 202014
8 202014
9 201611
10 201911
11 202010
12 202110
13 20209
14 20196
15 20205
16 20215
17 20194
18
Extraction of Vital Signs from Clinical Notes.
20153
19 20193
20
The Super Annotator: A Method of Semi-Automated Rare Event Identification for Large Clinical Data Sets.
20161

About Benjamin Viernes

Benjamin Viernes is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers) and Medical Coding and Health Information (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (14 citations), Clinical Psychology (56 citations), Social Psychology (38 citations), General Health Professions (38 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (5 citations). Benjamin Viernes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Kristine E. Lynch, Scott L. DuVall, Jennifer A. Sumner, Paul A. Dennis, Patrick R. Alba, Ramin Ebrahimi, Jean C. Beckham, Chi‐Hong Tseng, John R. Blosnich and A. Laurie Shroyer. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Health Issues, Nursing Outlook, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, CHEST Journal and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact