Benjamin Kick
Impact in
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Ecology top 10%
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Papers in
-
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 7
- RNA Interference and Gene Delivery 6
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction 1
- Ecology 5
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 5
- Co-authors
- Hendrik Dietz (7 shared papers)Florian Praetorius (4 shared papers)Dirk Weuster‐Botz (5 shared papers)Maximilian N. Honemann (1 shared paper)Thomas Gerling (2 shared papers)Massimo Kube (1 shared paper)Fabian Köhler (1 shared paper)Christian Wachauf (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering (1 paper)Journal of Biotechnology (1 paper)Biofabrication (1 paper)Science Advances (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanySaudi ArabiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Benjamin Kick
9 papers receiving 953 citations
Benjamin Kick's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Molecular Biology 867
- Ecology 221
- Biomedical Engineering 284
- Biomaterials 50
- Process Chemistry and Technology 8
Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Kick
This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Kick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Kick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Kick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Kick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Kick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Kick. The network helps show where Benjamin Kick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Kick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Biotechnological mass production of DNA origami Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 402 |
| 2 | 2018 | 215 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 112 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 102 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 |
About Benjamin Kick
Benjamin Kick is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Biomedical Engineering, Process Chemistry and Technology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 959 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (7 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (6 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (5 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (1 paper), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (1 paper), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (1 paper), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (1 paper) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (867 citations), Ecology (221 citations), Biomedical Engineering (284 citations), Biomaterials (50 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (8 citations). Benjamin Kick has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Saudi Arabia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hendrik Dietz, Florian Praetorius, Dirk Weuster‐Botz, Maximilian N. Honemann, Thomas Gerling, Massimo Kube, Fabian Köhler, Christian Wachauf, Stefan T. Arold and Adrian Gottschlich. Their work appears in journals such as Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Journal of Biotechnology, Biofabrication, Science Advances and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.