Benjamin Förg

765 citations
12 papers · 334 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Förg

12 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Benjamin Förg
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Structural Biology 21
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 272
  • Spectroscopy 84
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 50
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 50
Replace Johannes Schötz with:
Johannes Schötz Germany
Desiré Whitmore United States
Lamia Kasmi Switzerland
M. Jobst Germany
Nicola Di Palo Italy
Phillip M. Nagel United States
W. A. Okell United Kingdom
Michal Dagan United Kingdom
Paolo Farinello Italy
Vincent Cardin Canada
Benjamin Förg relative to Johannes Schötz Germany Johannes Schötz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Johannes Schötz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Förg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Förg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Förg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Förg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Förg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Förg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Förg. The network helps show where Benjamin Förg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Förg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Förg Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Förg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201656
2 202055
3 201954
4 201344
5 202035
6 201418
7 201616
8 201616
9 201715
10 201614
11 20167
12 20174

About Benjamin Förg

Benjamin Förg is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (9 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (3 papers), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (2 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (2 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (1 paper) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (21 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (272 citations), Spectroscopy (84 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (50 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (50 citations). Benjamin Förg has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, South Korea and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Matthias F. Kling, Johannes Schötz, I. Liontos, Abdallah M. Azzeer, P. Tzallas, D. Charalambidis, E. Skantzakis, A. R. Kessel, Nora G. Kling and Frederik Süßmann. Their work appears in journals such as APL Photonics, Physical Review X, Optics Express, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact