Benjamin Busch

1.5k citations
22 papers · 940 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 13
    • Fungal Biology and Applications 3
    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 6

Benjamin Busch

21 papers receiving 932 citations

Peers

Benjamin Busch
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Pharmacology 478
  • Biotechnology 141
  • Small Animals 62
  • Immunology 130
  • Organic Chemistry 178
Replace Xiuyun Tian with:
Xiuyun Tian China
Rowan P. Morris Switzerland
Gary Chrebet United States
Lai Yue Chan Australia
Aleksandra W. Debowski Australia
Ken B. Idler United States
Charles L. Hershberger United States
Robert B. Peery United States
Alfredo Staffa Canada
Si‐Kyu Lim United States
Benjamin Busch relative to Xiuyun Tian China Xiuyun Tian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.4×
Xiuyun Tian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Busch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Busch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Busch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Busch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Busch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Busch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Busch. The network helps show where Benjamin Busch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Busch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Busch Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Busch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016146
2 2013106
3 200994
4 201268
5 200967
6 199858
7 200952
8 201844
9 201044
10 202036
11 201335
12 200932
13 201529
14 200924
15 201221
16 201520
17 201216
18 201215
19 201313
20 201112

About Benjamin Busch

Benjamin Busch is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Plant Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 940 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (13 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (6 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (6 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (5 papers), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (4 papers), Galectins and Cancer Biology (3 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers) and Phytochemical compounds biological activities (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (478 citations), Biotechnology (141 citations), Small Animals (62 citations), Immunology (130 citations) and Organic Chemistry (178 citations). Benjamin Busch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christian Hertweck, Kirstin Scherlach, Björn Kusebauch, Martin M. Roth, Rainer Haas, Gerald Lackner, Uta Paszkowski, Wolfgang Fischer, Yuki Sugimoto and Eric J. Arnoys. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, PLoS Pathogens, Journal of the American Chemical Society, International Journal of Medical Microbiology and Carbohydrate Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact