Benjamin Bachrach

412 citations
10 papers · 263 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Bachrach

9 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Benjamin Bachrach
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Rehabilitation 64
  • Instrumentation 18
  • Safety Research 30
  • Finance 36
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 65
Replace Adilson Gonzaga with:
Adilson Gonzaga Brazil
Djordje Slijepčević Austria
Mariko Isogawa Japan
B P Pradeep Kumar India
Minhyuk Lee South Korea
Jin Ma China
Amitojdeep Singh Canada
Weijian Xie China
Carlos Santiago Portugal
Cristina Nader Vasconcelos Brazil
Benjamin Bachrach relative to Adilson Gonzaga Brazil Adilson Gonzaga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Adilson Gonzaga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Bachrach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Bachrach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Bachrach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Bachrach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Bachrach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Bachrach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Bachrach. The network helps show where Benjamin Bachrach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Bachrach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Bachrach Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Bachrach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 200567
2 197939
3 200238
4 201032
5 201030
6 200626
7 200820
8 20089
9 20102
10
Development of Superconducting Technology for Inertial Guidance, Gravity Survey and Fundamental Gravity Experiments.
19940

About Benjamin Bachrach

Benjamin Bachrach is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Instrumentation and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (2 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (2 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (1 paper), Inertial Sensor and Navigation (1 paper), Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (1 paper) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (64 citations), Instrumentation (18 citations), Safety Research (30 citations), Finance (36 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (65 citations). Benjamin Bachrach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include Randall F. Beer, Dan Galai, William Z. Rymer, Theodore V. Vorburger, Anurag Jain, Robert D. Koons, James H. Yen, Wei Chu, Junyeob Song and Thomas B. Renegar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forensic Sciences, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Measurement Science and Technology and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact