Ben Roberts

18 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Ben Roberts
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Archeology 22
  • Computer Science Applications 42
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 138
  • Paleontology 27
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
Replace Kaitlyn E. May with:
Kaitlyn E. May United States
Eero Tarasti Finland
Sydney M. Lamb United States
Christian Bentz Germany
Samuel Y. Edgerton United States
John Onians United Kingdom
Arndt Wilcke Germany
Maria Malina Germany
B. Tyr Fothergill United Kingdom
Rudolf P. Botha South Africa
Ben Roberts relative to Kaitlyn E. May United States Kaitlyn E. May's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Kaitlyn E. May · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Roberts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Roberts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Roberts. The network helps show where Ben Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Ben Roberts, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Roberts Line = papers co-authored together Ben Roberts links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011149
2 200333
3 200519
4 201913
5
Beyond the 'networked public sphere': politics, participation and technics in Web 2.0
200913
6 201211
7 201211
8 200710
9 20128
10 20068
11 20165
12
Attention-seeking: Technics, Publics and Software Individuation
20122
13 20112
14
Critical Digital Humanities and Machine-Learning
20172
15 20072
16 20091
17
Sweet smell of success
20131
18 20211
19 20171
20 20031

About Ben Roberts

Ben Roberts is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Networks and Communications, Paleontology and Anthropology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Media and Philosophy (5 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (2 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (2 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1 paper), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1 paper) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (22 citations), Computer Science Applications (42 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (138 citations), Paleontology (27 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations). Ben Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Edward T. Bullmore, Renaud Lambiotte, Jay N. Giedd, Nitin Gogtay, Aaron Alexander‐Bloch, Barbara S. Ottaway, Caroline Bassett, Bernard Stiegler, Azim U. Mallik and Jeremy Gilbert. Their work appears in journals such as Angelaki, Criticism, Postmodern Culture, Twentieth Century British History and Parallax.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact