Ben Akrigg

802 citations
5 papers · 33 · h-index 2

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Archeology top 10%
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
    • Historical and Architectural Studies

Papers in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies 3
    • Historical and Architectural Studies 2
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 1
    • Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 1
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 1

Ben Akrigg

3 papers receiving 22 citations

Peers

Ben Akrigg
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
  • Anthropology 20
  • Archeology 15
  • Classics 3
  • Literature and Literary Theory 4
  • Music 1
Replace Kate Gilhuly with:
Kate Gilhuly United States
Sophia Aneziri Greece
John Weisweiler United States
Edwyn Robert Bevan
David Sedley United States
Markus Asper Germany
Brigitte Le Guen
Paola Ceccarelli Italy
Kathleen McNamee United States
Niall McKeown
Ben Akrigg relative to Kate Gilhuly United States Kate Gilhuly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kate Gilhuly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Akrigg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Akrigg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Akrigg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Akrigg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Akrigg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Akrigg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Akrigg. The network helps show where Ben Akrigg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Ben Akrigg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Akrigg Line = papers co-authored together Ben Akrigg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 201116
2 201315
3 20161
4 20191
5 20240

About Ben Akrigg

Ben Akrigg is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Language and Linguistics, having authored 5 papers that have together received 33 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Classical Studies and Philology (1 paper), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (1 paper), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (1 paper) and Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (20 citations), Archeology (15 citations), Classics (3 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (4 citations) and Music (1 citation). Ben Akrigg has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claire Holleran, Νeville Morley, Saskia Hin, Christelle Fischer‐Bovet, Tim Parkin, S. Douglas Olson, Susan Lape, David Konstan, Kathryn Bosher and Cheryl Anne Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge University Press eBooks, History Reviews of New Books and CentAUR (University of Reading).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact