Markus Asper
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Theoretical Computer Science top 10%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
Papers in
- Anthropology 12
- Classical Antiquity Studies 12
-
- Classical Studies and Philology 12
- Co-authors
- Wolfgang Kullmann (1 shared paper)Victoria E. Rimell (1 shared paper)Sebastian Luft (2 shared papers)Callimachus (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philologus (1 paper)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (1 paper)Historia Mathematica (1 paper)The Classical World (1 paper)Husserl Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
Markus Asper
19 papers receiving 86 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Anthropology 86
- Theoretical Computer Science 11
- History 39
- Philosophy 33
- History and Philosophy of Science 16
Countries citing papers authored by Markus Asper
This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Asper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Asper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Asper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Asper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Asper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Asper. The network helps show where Markus Asper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Markus Asper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Onomata Allotria: zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos | 1999 | 43 |
| 2 | Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike | 1998 | 39 |
| 3 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 5 | Imagining empire : political space in Hellenistic and Roman literature | 2017 | 15 |
| 6 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 10 | Stoicheia und Gesetze. Spekulationen zur Entstehung mathematischer Textformen in Griechenland | 2001 | 3 |
| 11 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 17 | Die Worte der Sieben Weisen | 2006 | 1 |
| 18 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 1 |
About Markus Asper
Markus Asper is a scholar working on Anthropology, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Theoretical Computer Science and History, having authored 32 papers that have together received 179 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Studies and Philology (12 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (12 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (10 papers), History of Medicine Studies (5 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (3 papers) and Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (86 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (11 citations), History (39 citations), Philosophy (33 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations). Markus Asper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Kullmann, Victoria E. Rimell, Sebastian Luft and Callimachus. Their work appears in journals such as Philologus, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Historia Mathematica, The Classical World and Husserl Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.