Markus Asper
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 10%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
Papers in
- Anthropology 11
- Classical Antiquity Studies 8
- Historical and Literary Studies 4
-
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 7
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Wolfgang Kullmann (1 shared paper)Victoria Rimell (1 shared paper)Sebastian Luft (2 shared papers)Callimachus (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philologus (1 paper)Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A (1 paper)Historia Mathematica (1 paper)Antike und Abendland (1 paper)Husserl Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Markus Asper
17 papers receiving 87 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Theoretical Computer Science 11
- Anthropology 70
- History 38
- Archeology 35
- Classics 12
Countries citing papers authored by Markus Asper
This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Asper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Asper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Asper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Markus Asper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Asper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Asper. The network helps show where Markus Asper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Markus Asper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike | 1998 | 41 |
| 2 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 4 | Imagining empire : political space in Hellenistic and Roman literature | 2017 | 13 |
| 5 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 14 | Die Worte der Sieben Weisen | 2006 | 1 |
| 15 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 16 | Science Writing and Its Settings: Some Ancient Greek Modes | 2019 | 1 |
| 17 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 20 | Werke : griechisch und deutsch | 2004 | 0 |
About Markus Asper
Markus Asper is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Philosophy, Theoretical Computer Science and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 136 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (8 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (2 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (11 citations), Anthropology (70 citations), History (38 citations), Archeology (35 citations) and Classics (12 citations). Markus Asper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Kullmann, Victoria Rimell, Sebastian Luft and Callimachus. Their work appears in journals such as Philologus, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Historia Mathematica, Antike und Abendland and Husserl Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.