David Konstan
Impact in
- Anthropology top 0.5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
Papers in
- Anthropology 59
- Classical Antiquity Studies 54
- Philosophy 36
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 29
- Co-authors
- Robin Osborne (1 shared paper)Simon Goldhill (1 shared paper)Arnaldo Momigliano (1 shared paper)Leona Ascher (1 shared paper)William S. Anderson (1 shared paper)John Salmon (1 shared paper)Suzanne Saïd (1 shared paper)Lin Foxhall (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Classical World (11 papers)The American Journal of Philology (7 papers)Phoenix (5 papers)Common Knowledge (5 papers)Classical Philology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
David Konstan
123 papers receiving 912 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Anthropology 625
- Philosophy 356
- Classics 104
- Archeology 287
- Religious studies 116
Countries citing papers authored by David Konstan
This map shows the geographic impact of David Konstan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Konstan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Konstan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Konstan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Konstan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Konstan. The network helps show where David Konstan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Konstan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 160 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 171 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 127 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 116 | |
| 4 | The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks | 2006 | 55 |
| 5 | 2008 | 49 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 49 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 29 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1995 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 17 | |
| 18 | Greeks on Greekness: Viewing the Greek Past Under the Roman Empire | 2006 | 16 |
| 19 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 20 | Catullus' indictment of Rome: The meaning of Catullus 64 | 1977 | 16 |
About David Konstan
David Konstan is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies, having authored 160 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (54 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (29 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (17 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (12 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (8 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (6 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (6 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (625 citations), Philosophy (356 citations), Classics (104 citations), Archeology (287 citations) and Religious studies (116 citations). David Konstan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robin Osborne, Simon Goldhill, Arnaldo Momigliano, Leona Ascher, William S. Anderson, John Salmon, Suzanne Saïd, Lin Foxhall, Matthew Dillon and Susan Lape. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, The American Journal of Philology, Phoenix, Common Knowledge and Classical Philology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.