Beier Qi

433 citations
45 papers · 264 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Beier Qi

43 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers

Beier Qi
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Sensory Systems 78
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 193
  • Speech and Hearing 29
  • Signal Processing 44
  • Otorhinolaryngology 15
Replace Jiunn‐Liang Wu with:
Jiunn‐Liang Wu Taiwan
Emily R. Spitzer United States
Jae Hee Lee South Korea
Chelsea M. Blankenship United States
Martina Brendel Germany
Amy P. Olund United States
Lina Motlagh Zadeh United States
Danielle Glista Canada
Junghwa Bahng South Korea
Jani Johnson United States
Beier Qi relative to Jiunn‐Liang Wu Taiwan Jiunn‐Liang Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Jiunn‐Liang Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beier Qi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beier Qi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beier Qi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beier Qi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beier Qi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beier Qi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beier Qi. The network helps show where Beier Qi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beier Qi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beier Qi Line = papers co-authored together Beier Qi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201228
2 201022
3 202018
4 201717
5 201915
6 201215
7 201814
8 202012
9 201311
10 20179
11 20108
12 20128
13 20168
14 20108
15 20146
16 20235
17
[Analysis of the found age and way for children age 0 to 6 with hearing loss].
20064
18 20184
19
[Lexical tone perception and quality of life in nurotron cochlear implant users].
20144
20 20244

About Beier Qi

Beier Qi is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing, Neurology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 45 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (13 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques (1 paper), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (1 paper) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (78 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (193 citations), Speech and Hearing (29 citations), Signal Processing (44 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (15 citations). Beier Qi has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Xueqing Chen, Shuo Wang, Demin Han, Luo Zhang, Ying Kong, Lihui Huang, Li Xu, Demin Han, Haihong Liu and Xueqing Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Oto-Laryngologica, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Brain Imaging and Behavior, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact