Bärbel Vieth
Impact in
- Analytical Chemistry top 2%
- Analytical chemistry methods development
- Food Science top 2%
- Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Papers in
-
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 5
-
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism 4
- Co-authors
- Lutz Alder (1 shared paper)Kerstin Greulich (1 shared paper)Günther Kempe (1 shared paper)Andreas Luch (5 shared papers)Ursula Gundert‐Remy (4 shared papers)Barbara Heinrich-Hirsch (3 shared papers)Ulrike Bernauer (3 shared papers)Karla Pfaff (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Archives of Toxicology (2 papers)Mass Spectrometry Reviews (1 paper)Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (1 paper)Critical Reviews in Toxicology (1 paper)Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Bärbel Vieth
9 papers receiving 653 citations
Bärbel Vieth's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Analytical Chemistry 244
- Food Science 403
- Spectroscopy 173
- Animal Science and Zoology 90
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 102
Countries citing papers authored by Bärbel Vieth
This map shows the geographic impact of Bärbel Vieth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bärbel Vieth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bärbel Vieth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bärbel Vieth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bärbel Vieth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bärbel Vieth. The network helps show where Bärbel Vieth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bärbel Vieth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Residue analysis of 500 high priority pesticides: Better by GC–MS or LC–MS/MS? Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 504 |
| 2 | 2019 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 5 |
About Bärbel Vieth
Bärbel Vieth is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pharmacology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Oncology and Spectroscopy, having authored 9 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (5 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (2 papers), Occupational exposure and asthma (1 paper), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (1 paper) and Fashion and Cultural Textiles (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (244 citations), Food Science (403 citations), Spectroscopy (173 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (90 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (102 citations). Bärbel Vieth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lutz Alder, Kerstin Greulich, Günther Kempe, Andreas Luch, Ursula Gundert‐Remy, Barbara Heinrich-Hirsch, Ulrike Bernauer, Karla Pfaff, G.-R. Jänig and Oliver Kappenstein. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Toxicology, Mass Spectrometry Reviews, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Critical Reviews in Toxicology and Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.