Barbara Wright

961 citations
29 papers · 679 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Barbara Wright

27 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Barbara Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Library and Information Sciences 14
  • General Health Professions 163
  • Emergency Medicine 37
  • Cancer Research 63
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 68
Replace Heleen M.E. van Agt with:
Heleen M.E. van Agt Netherlands
Dorice Vieira United States
Yukari Yamada Japan
Kathleen Neville United States
Kris G. Thomas United States
Patrick Jahn Germany
Tania Fernández‐Villa Spain
Anna Wilkinson United Kingdom
Timothy M. Morgan United States
Barbara Wright relative to Heleen M.E. van Agt Netherlands Heleen M.E. van Agt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Heleen M.E. van Agt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Wright. The network helps show where Barbara Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara Wright Line = papers co-authored together Barbara Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010174
2 198384
3 195655
4 201552
5 199440
6 201036
7 200128
8 195127
9 198625
10 197624
11 199022
12 201318
13 199316
14 199814
15 199613
16 201012
17 20008
18 19937
19 19936
20
Remote users of health sciences libraries
19984

About Barbara Wright

Barbara Wright is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Physiology, Cancer Research and Surgery, having authored 29 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers), Library Science and Administration (2 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper) and Disability Education and Employment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (14 citations), General Health Professions (163 citations), Emergency Medicine (37 citations), Cancer Research (63 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (68 citations). Barbara Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C. David Williams, John N. Clore, Shari Schubert, Irving S. Wright, G P Konok, Judy Caines, Eleanor R. Adair, Belinda Curpen, Myron L. Weisfeldt and Ellen Warner. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Medical Reference Services Quarterly, American Journal of Roentgenology, Current Problems in Cancer and Library trends.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact