B. Potter

683 citations
22 papers · 564 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

B. Potter

22 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers

B. Potter
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 287
  • Developmental Neuroscience 45
  • Neurology 65
  • Periodontics 19
  • Physiology 15
Replace Yoshimitsu Yura with:
Yoshimitsu Yura Japan
Sandra Fok Australia
Parth Shah United States
Victor Blanco United States
Yoko Sakurai Japan
Roger Besançon France
Maureen A. Connolly United States
Jennifer L. Kanter United States
Bitao Bu China
B. Potter relative to Yoshimitsu Yura Japan Yoshimitsu Yura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Yoshimitsu Yura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. Potter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Potter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Potter. The network helps show where B. Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside B. Potter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. Potter Line = papers co-authored together B. Potter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999263
2 200790
3 201245
4 200730
5 198925
6 201923
7 200719
8 196617
9 198712
10 196611
11 19917
12 19857
13 20164
14 20122
15 20222
16 20251
17 20221
18 20181
19 20041
20
The high sensitivity (SEN) of 99mTc-Tilmanocept (TcTm) is unaffected by injection route and interval from injection to surgery across solid tumor types [breast cancer (BC), melanoma (ME) & head/neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)]
20141

About B. Potter

B. Potter is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers) and Oral Health Pathology and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (287 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (45 citations), Neurology (65 citations), Periodontics (19 citations) and Physiology (15 citations). B. Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Krystyna M. Wozniak, Richard J. Traystman, Barbara S. Slusher, James J. Vornov, Izumi Harukuni, Xi Lu, Marc Yudkoff, Frank C. Tortella, Anish Bhardwaj and Patricia D. Hurn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Veterinary Cardiology, Toxicologic Pathology, Developmental Psychobiology, Nature Medicine and The American Journal of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact