B. Dienes

3.8k citations
56 papers · 959 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

B. Dienes

55 papers receiving 949 citations

Peers

B. Dienes
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Sensory Systems 96
  • Biochemistry 79
  • Aging 19
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 182
  • Rehabilitation 58
Replace Mónika Gönczi with:
Mónika Gönczi Hungary
Yewei Liu United States
Salil Srivastava United Kingdom
Paolo Mondola Italy
Kristin A. Gerhold United States
Laura Vay Spain
Xiaohui Sun China
Jeanne de la Roche Germany
Yuyang Sun United States
Mi-Kyung Park South Korea
B. Dienes relative to Mónika Gönczi Hungary Mónika Gönczi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Mónika Gönczi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by B. Dienes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Dienes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Dienes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Dienes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Dienes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Dienes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Dienes. The network helps show where B. Dienes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside B. Dienes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with B. Dienes Line = papers co-authored together B. Dienes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019166
2 200768
3 201360
4 201357
5 201435
6 200634
7 201633
8 202033
9 201630
10 201729
11 201629
12 201628
13 200825
14 201424
15 201623
16 201623
17 202222
18 202320
19 200820
20 202016

About B. Dienes

B. Dienes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sensory Systems and Physiology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 959 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (15 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (11 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (7 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (6 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (5 papers) and Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (96 citations), Biochemistry (79 citations), Aging (19 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (182 citations) and Rehabilitation (58 citations). B. Dienes has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Romania and United States. Frequent co-authors include László Csernoch, Péter Szentesi, Mónika Gönczi, Mónika Sztretye, János Fodor, Tamás Oláh, Anikó Keller-Pintér, László Szabó, Zoltán Rusznák and Andrea Telek. Their work appears in journals such as Biophysical Journal, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, The Journal of Physiology, Frontiers in Physiology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact