A.-W. Chan
Impact in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Papers in
-
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews 7
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Co-authors
- Douglas G. Altman (4 shared papers)David Moher (4 shared papers)Susan Michie (3 shared papers)Paul Glasziou (3 shared papers)Ruairidh Milne (3 shared papers)Mary Dixon‐Woods (3 shared papers)Isabelle Boutron (3 shared papers)Virginia Barbour (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ (2 papers)Virology (1 paper)Canadian Medical Association Journal (1 paper)Das Gesundheitswesen (2 papers)Hong Kong Medical Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
A.-W. Chan
10 papers receiving 11.3k citations
A.-W. Chan's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 649
- Rehabilitation 402
- Applied Psychology 273
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 176
- General Health Professions 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by A.-W. Chan
This map shows the geographic impact of A.-W. Chan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.-W. Chan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.-W. Chan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A.-W. Chan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.-W. Chan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.-W. Chan. The network helps show where A.-W. Chan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.-W. Chan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 6770 |
| 2 | SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 3668 |
| 3 | 2010 | 347 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 319 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 136 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 115 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 2 |
About A.-W. Chan
A.-W. Chan is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 11.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (1 paper), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper) and Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (649 citations), Rehabilitation (402 citations), Applied Psychology (273 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (176 citations) and General Health Professions (1.1k citations). A.-W. Chan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Douglas G. Altman, David Moher, Susan Michie, Paul Glasziou, Ruairidh Milne, Mary Dixon‐Woods, Isabelle Boutron, Virginia Barbour, Tammy Hoffmann and Rafael Perera. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Virology, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Das Gesundheitswesen and Hong Kong Medical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.