Austin Booth
Impact in
- Library and Information Sciences top 0.5%
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Usability and User Interface Design
Papers in
-
- Library Science and Information Systems 2
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 1
-
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship 2
- Co-authors
- Nancy H. Dewald (1 shared paper)Cynthia S. Levine (1 shared paper)Elisabeth Dowling Root (1 shared paper)Marc R. Larochelle (2 shared papers)Sharon Walsh (2 shared papers)Dana Bernson (1 shared paper)Jeffery Talbert (2 shared papers)Svetla Slavova (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Serials Review (2 papers)Drug and Alcohol Dependence (2 papers)The Journal of Academic Librarianship (2 papers)Journal of Library Administration (1 paper)Biochemical Education (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth SudanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Austin Booth
9 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Library and Information Sciences 120
- Human-Computer Interaction 84
- Information Systems 221
- Computer Science Applications 43
- Information Systems and Management 50
Countries citing papers authored by Austin Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of Austin Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Austin Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Austin Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Austin Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Austin Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Austin Booth. The network helps show where Austin Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Austin Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 207 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 0 |
About Austin Booth
Austin Booth is a scholar working on Information Systems, Literature and Literary Theory, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Library and Information Sciences and Communication, having authored 10 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (2 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (2 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper) and COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (120 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (84 citations), Information Systems (221 citations), Computer Science Applications (43 citations) and Information Systems and Management (50 citations). Austin Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Sudan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nancy H. Dewald, Cynthia S. Levine, Elisabeth Dowling Root, Marc R. Larochelle, Sharon Walsh, Dana Bernson, Jeffery Talbert, Svetla Slavova, Charles Knott and Daniel J. Feaster. Their work appears in journals such as Serials Review, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Journal of Library Administration and Biochemical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.