Aurélie Thomas
Impact in
- Equine top 2%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 1%
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Animal testing and alternatives
Papers in
-
- Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 5
- Animal testing and alternatives 3
- Surgery 2
- Co-authors
- Paul Flecknell (8 shared papers)Matthew C. Leach (2 shared papers)Stephanie Keating (1 shared paper)Bertram Wiedenmann (1 shared paper)Dirk Laurent (1 shared paper)Clemens Unger (1 shared paper)U. Vanhoefer (1 shared paper)Joachim Drevs (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (5 papers)BMC Veterinary Research (2 papers)Emergency Medicine Journal (1 paper)Lab Animal (1 paper)Laboratory Animals (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumGermany
In The Last Decade
Aurélie Thomas
13 papers receiving 502 citations
Aurélie Thomas's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Equine 73
- Small Animals 284
- Animal Science and Zoology 67
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 26
- Microbiology 22
Countries citing papers authored by Aurélie Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Aurélie Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aurélie Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aurélie Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aurélie Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aurélie Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aurélie Thomas. The network helps show where Aurélie Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Aurélie Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evaluation of EMLA Cream for Preventing Pain during Tattooing of Rabbits: Changes in Physiological, Behavioural and Facial Expression Responses Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 264 |
| 2 | 2003 | 89 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 2 |
About Aurélie Thomas
Aurélie Thomas is a scholar working on Small Animals, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (5 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper), Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (1 paper), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (1 paper), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper) and Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (73 citations), Small Animals (284 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (67 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (26 citations) and Microbiology (22 citations). Aurélie Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul Flecknell, Matthew C. Leach, Stephanie Keating, Bertram Wiedenmann, Dirk Laurent, Clemens Unger, U. Vanhoefer, Joachim Drevs, Margaret Dugan and Bruno Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Veterinary Research, Emergency Medicine Journal, Lab Animal and Laboratory Animals.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.