Astrid Wolf‐Magele

20 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Astrid Wolf‐Magele
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Otorhinolaryngology 336
  • Sensory Systems 62
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 138
  • Neurology 75
  • Surgery 89
Replace Ann-Louise McDermott with:
Ann-Louise McDermott United Kingdom
Maarten J. F. de Wolf Netherlands
F M Vaneecloo France
Rik C. Nelissen Netherlands
Yotaka Fukuda Brazil
F.M. Snik Netherlands
Mario Zernotti Argentina
Özgür Tarkan Türkiye
Yisgav Shapira Israel
Renaud Meller France
Astrid Wolf‐Magele relative to Ann-Louise McDermott United Kingdom Ann-Louise McDermott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ann-Louise McDermott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Astrid Wolf‐Magele

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Astrid Wolf‐Magele's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Astrid Wolf‐Magele with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Astrid Wolf‐Magele more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Astrid Wolf‐Magele

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Astrid Wolf‐Magele. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Astrid Wolf‐Magele. The network helps show where Astrid Wolf‐Magele may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Astrid Wolf‐Magele, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Astrid Wolf‐Magele Line = papers co-authored together Astrid Wolf‐Magele links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2015135
2 2013111
3 200768
4 201647
5 201242
6 201530
7 201524
8 201119
9 201112
10 20149
11 20159
12 20158
13 20138
14 20167
15 20155
16 20125
17 20164
18 20143
19 20132
20 20111

About Astrid Wolf‐Magele

Astrid Wolf‐Magele is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (12 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (1 paper), Hearing Impairment and Communication (1 paper), Vector-borne infectious diseases (1 paper) and Ear and Head Tumors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (336 citations), Sensory Systems (62 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (138 citations), Neurology (75 citations) and Surgery (89 citations). Astrid Wolf‐Magele has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Georg Mathias Sprinzl, Ingo Todt, Thomas Lenarz, Robert Mlynski, Rudolf Hagen, Arne Ernst, Hamidreza Mojallal, Herbert Riechelmann, Florian Augustin and Philipp Werner. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Clinical Otolaryngology, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology and European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact