Ashley Scott
Impact in
- Paleontology top 10%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Archeology top 5%
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Papers in
- History 4
- Historical and Archaeological Studies 4
-
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 2
- Co-authors
- Christina Warinner (3 shared papers)Richard Hagan (2 shared papers)Philipp W. Stockhammer (2 shared papers)Jonas Grossmann (2 shared papers)Paolo Nanni (2 shared papers)Jessica Hendy (2 shared papers)Michal Artzy (1 shared paper)Robert C. Power (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The English Historical Review (3 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Early Medieval Europe (1 paper)Plant Methods (1 paper)Continuity and Change (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Ashley Scott
11 papers receiving 194 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Paleontology 87
- Archeology 51
- Geography, Planning and Development 26
- Anthropology 43
- Archeology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Ashley Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Ashley Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ashley Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ashley Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ashley Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ashley Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ashley Scott. The network helps show where Ashley Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ashley Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 87 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 5 | The lay intellectual in Anglo-Saxon England: Ealdorman Æthelweard and the politics of history | 2007 | 4 |
| 6 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 12 | How Icelanders Experienced Byzantium, Real and Imagined | 2013 | 0 |
| 13 | 2014 | 0 |
About Ashley Scott
Ashley Scott is a scholar working on History, Paleontology, Classics, Archeology and General Health Professions, having authored 13 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Archaeological Studies (4 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (1 paper), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1 paper), Forensic and Genetic Research (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper) and Paleopathology and ancient diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (87 citations), Archeology (51 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations), Anthropology (43 citations) and Archeology (3 citations). Ashley Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christina Warinner, Richard Hagan, Philipp W. Stockhammer, Jonas Grossmann, Paolo Nanni, Jessica Hendy, Michal Artzy, Robert C. Power, Ianir Milevski and Mario A. S. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as The English Historical Review, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Early Medieval Europe, Plant Methods and Continuity and Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.