Ashley E. Kim

457 citations
5 papers · 94 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

    • Influenza Virus Research Studies 2
    • Respiratory viral infections research 1
    • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance 1
    • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing 2

Ashley E. Kim

5 papers receiving 91 citations

Peers

Ashley E. Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Infectious Diseases 66
  • Modeling and Simulation 7
  • Epidemiology 23
  • General Dentistry 1
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 11
Replace Emma Hannay with:
Emma Hannay Switzerland
Neeraj Aggarwal India
Fábio Ghilardi Brazil
Alberto Battaglini Italy
Laura Presland United Kingdom
Nieves Gonzalo-Jiménez Spain
Chaney C. Kalinich United States
Alain Wilmet Belgium
Nazanin Janfaza Iran
Azuka Patrick Okwuraiwe Nigeria
Ashley E. Kim relative to Emma Hannay Switzerland Emma Hannay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Emma Hannay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ashley E. Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ashley E. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ashley E. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ashley E. Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ashley E. Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ashley E. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ashley E. Kim. The network helps show where Ashley E. Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ashley E. Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ashley E. Kim Line = papers co-authored together Ashley E. Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 202068
2 202110
3 20219
4 20196
5 20211

About Ashley E. Kim

Ashley E. Kim is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, General Dentistry, General Health Professions and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 5 papers that have together received 94 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (2 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (1 paper), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (1 paper), Dental Research and COVID-19 (1 paper), Respiratory viral infections research (1 paper) and Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (66 citations), Modeling and Simulation (7 citations), Epidemiology (23 citations), General Dentistry (1 citation) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (11 citations). Ashley E. Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen Y. Chu, Janet A. Englund, Naomi Wilcox, Alexander L. Greninger, Denise J. McCulloch, Jennifer K. Logue, Elisabeth Brandstetter, Barry R. Lutz, Victoria Lyon and James P. Hughes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Microbiology, JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact