Arpit Dua

692 citations
23 papers · 395 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Arpit Dua

23 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Arpit Dua
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Condensed Matter Physics 134
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 301
  • Geometry and Topology 44
  • Artificial Intelligence 150
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 49
Replace Wilbur Shirley with:
Wilbur Shirley United States
Guanyu Zhu United States
David T. Stephen United States
Kasper Duivenvoorden Germany
Davide Vodola Italy
David Aasen United States
S. L. Sondhi United States
Bhuvanesh Sundar United States
Henrik Dreyer Germany
Xinsheng Tan China
Arpit Dua relative to Wilbur Shirley United States Wilbur Shirley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Wilbur Shirley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Arpit Dua

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arpit Dua's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arpit Dua with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arpit Dua more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arpit Dua

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arpit Dua. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arpit Dua. The network helps show where Arpit Dua may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Arpit Dua, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Arpit Dua Line = papers co-authored together Arpit Dua links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201948
2 202232
3 202031
4 201929
5 202227
6 202426
7 202325
8 201924
9 202223
10 202421
11 201518
12 202413
13 202313
14 202310
15 201610
16 202110
17 20238
18 20237
19 20246
20 20244

About Arpit Dua

Arpit Dua is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum many-body systems (15 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (12 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (7 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (4 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers) and Cellular Automata and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (134 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (301 citations), Geometry and Topology (44 citations), Artificial Intelligence (150 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (49 citations). Arpit Dua has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dominic J. Williamson, Meng Cheng, Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Wilbur Shirley, Liang Jiang, Yu-An Chen, David T. Stephen, Guanyu Zhu, Huaixiu Zheng and Tomas Jochym-O’Connor. Their work appears in journals such as PRX Quantum, Physical review. B., Quantum, SciPost Physics and Physical Review Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact