Christopher T. Chubb

618 citations
13 papers · 321 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher T. Chubb

13 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Christopher T. Chubb
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Computational Mathematics 47
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 111
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 220
  • Artificial Intelligence 199
  • Condensed Matter Physics 35
Replace Jacob C. Bridgeman with:
Jacob C. Bridgeman Australia
Andrew J. Ferris Australia
Markus Hauru United States
Artur García-Sáez Spain
Emanuele Tirrito Italy
Jonas Haferkamp Germany
Péter Vrana Hungary
Tibor Rakovszky United States
Ivan Kukuljan Slovenia
Daniel K. Mark United States
Christopher T. Chubb relative to Jacob C. Bridgeman Australia Jacob C. Bridgeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Jacob C. Bridgeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher T. Chubb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher T. Chubb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher T. Chubb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher T. Chubb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher T. Chubb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher T. Chubb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher T. Chubb. The network helps show where Christopher T. Chubb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Christopher T. Chubb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher T. Chubb Line = papers co-authored together Christopher T. Chubb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2017214
2 201830
3 201916
4 201814
5 202313
6 20198
7 20247
8 20156
9 20174
10 20243
11 20242
12 20192
13
20162

About Christopher T. Chubb

Christopher T. Chubb is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computational Mathematics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (9 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (9 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (5 papers), Quantum many-body systems (5 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (3 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (3 papers), Tensor decomposition and applications (1 paper) and Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (47 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (111 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (220 citations), Artificial Intelligence (199 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (35 citations). Christopher T. Chubb has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jacob C. Bridgeman, Marco Tomamichel, Kamil Korzekwa, Terry Farrelly, Tobias J. Osborne, Cédric Bény, Steven T. Flammia, Eric J. Huang, Joseph M. Renes and Michael Vasmer. Their work appears in journals such as PRX Quantum, Quantum, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Physical review. A and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact