Annie Lin

580 citations
36 papers · 401 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Annie Lin

32 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

Annie Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Reproductive Medicine 194
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 87
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 20
  • Molecular Medicine 9
  • Clinical Psychology 32
Replace Hyun Hee Jo with:
Hyun Hee Jo South Korea
Hava‐Shoshana Barkai United States
Marija Andjelkovic Serbia
Pei‐Ying Ling Taiwan
Grażyna Lutosławska Poland
Evelin Mäestu Estonia
David M. Antle Canada
Tracey Matthews United States
Jacqueline Davis Australia
Nathan A. Lewis United Kingdom
Annie Lin relative to Hyun Hee Jo South Korea Hyun Hee Jo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hyun Hee Jo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annie Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annie Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annie Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annie Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annie Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annie Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annie Lin. The network helps show where Annie Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annie Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annie Lin Line = papers co-authored together Annie Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201961
2 202038
3 201737
4 202037
5 201837
6 201437
7 201920
8 201319
9 202114
10 202113
11 201910
12 201610
13 20218
14 20197
15 20257
16 20236
17
Resilience and smoking: the implications for general practitioners and other primary healthcare practitioners.
20126
18 20186
19 20215
20 20235

About Annie Lin

Annie Lin is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (9 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (194 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (87 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (20 citations), Molecular Medicine (9 citations) and Clinical Psychology (32 citations). Annie Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Marla E. Lujan, Kathleen M. Hoeger, Brittany Y Jarrett, Heidi Vanden Brink, Jeffery Sobal, Steven D. Spandorfer, Jamie Dollahite, Maryam Kazemi, Nabil Alshurafa and Bonnie Spring. Their work appears in journals such as Current Developments in Nutrition, Nutrients, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Fertility and Sterility.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact