Annick Pierce

1.1k citations
12 papers · 950 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Annick Pierce

12 papers receiving 914 citations

Peers

Annick Pierce
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 477
  • Neurology 75
  • Physiology 43
  • Biomaterials 115
  • Pharmaceutical Science 44
Replace Monique Benaı̈ssa with:
Monique Benaı̈ssa France
Annick Pierce France
Lotta Gustafsson Sweden
Anna Ohradanova‐Repic Austria
Zhefeng Qian China
Gaia Codolo Italy
Sidney H. Stein United States
Catherine Walker United Kingdom
Renzo Menegazzi Italy
Marc Daigneault United Kingdom
Annick Pierce relative to Monique Benaı̈ssa France Monique Benaı̈ssa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Monique Benaı̈ssa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annick Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annick Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annick Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annick Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annick Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annick Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annick Pierce. The network helps show where Annick Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annick Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annick Pierce Line = papers co-authored together Annick Pierce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1999355
2 2007229
3 2004122
4 199952
5 199945
6 200739
7 201231
8 201031
9 201520
10 201414
11 199810
12
Construction of a multi-functional helper-dependent adenovirus based system for cancer gene therapy.
20092

About Annick Pierce

Annick Pierce is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Genetics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infant Nutrition and Health (10 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (477 citations), Neurology (75 citations), Physiology (43 citations), Biomaterials (115 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (44 citations). Annick Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Joël Mazurier, Monique Benaı̈ssa, Elisabeth Elass, Dominique Legrand, Christophe Mariller, Carine Fillebeen, Geneviève Spik, Roméo Cecchelli, Laurence Fénart and Marie‐Pierre Dehouck. Their work appears in journals such as BioMetals, Advances in experimental medicine and biology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE and Journal of Neurochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact