Anne Young

51 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Anne Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Health 307
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 229
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 32
  • General Health Professions 349
  • Applied Psychology 70
Replace Carol L. McWilliam with:
Carol L. McWilliam Canada
David Grembowski United States
William Lauder United Kingdom
Emı́lia Campos de Carvalho Brazil
Helen L. Metzner United States
Thomas M. Lasater United States
Sarah Wamala Sweden
Stephanie Tierney United Kingdom
Varda Soskolne Israel
Kristen M. Swanson United States
Anne Young relative to Carol L. McWilliam Canada Carol L. McWilliam's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Carol L. McWilliam · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Young. The network helps show where Anne Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Young Line = papers co-authored together Anne Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006270
2 2004212
3 2008130
4 2003114
5 200887
6 200484
7 200778
8 200673
9 200668
10 200764
11 200757
12 200156
13 199952
14 200450
15 200544
16
The female condom : a review
199741
17 200941
18 200840
19 200135
20 200034

About Anne Young

Anne Young is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Complementary and alternative medicine and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (9 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (6 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (2 papers) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (307 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (229 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (32 citations), General Health Professions (349 citations) and Applied Psychology (70 citations). Anne Young has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer R. Powers, David Sibbritt, Julie Byles, Sandra Bell, Jon Adams, Anne Russell, Clare E. Collins, Annette J. Dobson, Allison Hodge and Gary Easthope. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, The Medical Journal of Australia, Social Science & Medicine, International Journal of Obesity and Public Health Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact