Anne Roeters

728 citations
25 papers · 483 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Roeters

21 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Anne Roeters
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Gender Studies 156
  • Sociology and Political Science 324
  • Demography 70
  • Social Psychology 89
  • General Health Professions 86
Replace Stella Chatzitheochari with:
Stella Chatzitheochari United Kingdom
Sarah M. Kendig United States
Mylène Lachance‐Grzela Canada
Brenda L. Seery United States
Margaret Ward Australia
Seongryeol Ryu United States
Jaerim Lee South Korea
Yun‐Suk Lee South Korea
Carolyn Y. Tubbs United States
Edward D. Lowe United States
Anne Roeters relative to Stella Chatzitheochari United Kingdom Stella Chatzitheochari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Stella Chatzitheochari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Roeters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Roeters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Roeters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Roeters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Roeters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Roeters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Roeters. The network helps show where Anne Roeters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Anne Roeters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Roeters Line = papers co-authored together Anne Roeters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201090
2 201867
3 201662
4 200958
5 201439
6 201634
7 201533
8 201217
9 201416
10 201115
11 201813
12 201911
13 201010
14 20136
15 20154
16
Time use in the Netherlands
20192
17
Work schedules, childcare and well-being
20132
18
Looking after the household and family care
20191
19 20201
20 20141

About Anne Roeters

Anne Roeters is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Demography, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (16 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (11 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (7 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (4 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (156 citations), Sociology and Political Science (324 citations), Demography (70 citations), Social Psychology (89 citations) and General Health Professions (86 citations). Anne Roeters has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Tanja van der Lippe, Esther S. Kluwer, Pablo Gracia, Mara A. Yerkes, Janeen Baxter, Lyn Craig, Jornt J. Mandemakers, Marieke Voorpostel, Vanessa May and Mia Tammelin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marriage and the Family, Community Work & Family, Social Indicators Research, Journal of Child and Family Studies and International Journal of Comparative Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact