Anne Mitchell

38 papers receiving 821 citations

Peers

Anne Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Gender Studies 134
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 148
  • Library and Information Sciences 12
  • Reproductive Medicine 48
  • Social Psychology 122
Replace Catherine Butler with:
Catherine Butler United Kingdom
Kenji Yoshino Japan
Lori Campbell Canada
Soo Yang South Korea
Susan Miller United States
Rosie Taylor United Kingdom
Josephine Johnston United States
Joanna Almeida United States
Andrea Daley Canada
David Smart United Kingdom
Anne Mitchell relative to Catherine Butler United Kingdom Catherine Butler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Catherine Butler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Mitchell. The network helps show where Anne Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Anne Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996178
2 201473
3 200970
4 201367
5 201061
6 201540
7 201034
8 201029
9 200628
10 201628
11 200927
12 200620
13 200518
14 200618
15 201118
16 202216
17 200516
18 200014
19 200512
20 201112

About Anne Mitchell

Anne Mitchell is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Gender Studies, Information Systems, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (11 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (6 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (5 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (4 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (4 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (3 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (134 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (148 citations), Library and Information Sciences (12 citations), Reproductive Medicine (48 citations) and Social Psychology (122 citations). Anne Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marian Pitts, Wendy Heywood, Kent Patrick, Anthony M. A. Smith, Paul A. Agius, Leslie J. Sheffield, Samuel F. Berkovic, R. Anne Howell, Anne M. McIntosh and John L. Hopper. Their work appears in journals such as The Serials Librarian, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Journal of Adolescent Health, Journal of School Health and The American Archivist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact