Anne Mathiot

19 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Anne Mathiot
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Applied Psychology 45
  • Speech and Hearing 39
  • Clinical Psychology 115
  • General Health Professions 104
  • Social Psychology 91
Replace Laurie Day with:
Laurie Day United States
Gareth Furber Australia
Amy Blake United States
Hamidin Awang Malaysia
Cynthia G. Ayres United States
Franklin N. Glozah Ghana
Minna Pietikäinen Finland
Sarah Adams United Kingdom
Angela Roddenberry United States
Selene Valero‐Moreno Spain
Anne Mathiot relative to Laurie Day United States Laurie Day's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Laurie Day · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Mathiot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Mathiot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Mathiot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Mathiot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Mathiot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Mathiot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Mathiot. The network helps show where Anne Mathiot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Mathiot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Mathiot Line = papers co-authored together Anne Mathiot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2018210
2 201951
3 201439
4 201124
5 201923
6 201723
7 201917
8 201616
9 202015
10 201912
11 20189
12 20179
13 20168
14 20184
15 20203
16 20182
17
Initiating change in the school environment to reduce bullying and aggression: a cluster randomised controlled trial of the Learning Together (LT) intervention in English secondary schools
20181
18 20151
19
Fitness may be more important for cardiovascular health than adiposity in adolescent girls
20141

About Anne Mathiot

Anne Mathiot is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Education, having authored 19 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper) and Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (45 citations), Speech and Hearing (39 citations), Clinical Psychology (115 citations), General Health Professions (104 citations) and Social Psychology (91 citations). Anne Mathiot has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Greece and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Russell Viner, Chris Bonell, Elizabeth Allen, Farah Jamal, Diana Elbourne, Deborah Christie, Adam Fletcher, Leonardo Bevilacqua, Emily Warren and Rosa Legood. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Journal of Adolescent Health, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Archives of Disease in Childhood and Journal of School Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact