Anne Forrest

433 citations
20 papers · 283 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Forrest

19 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Anne Forrest
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Public Administration 65
  • General Decision Sciences 27
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 39
  • Gender Studies 72
  • Health 35
Replace Paul A. Hagstrom with:
Paul A. Hagstrom United States
J. Michael Dumond United States
Mariona Lozano Spain
Michail Veliziotis United Kingdom
Anthony M. Messina United States
Nicole M. Humphrey United States
Ivana Fellini Italy
Mette Lykke Nielsen Denmark
Amy Y.C. Liu Australia
Gregg M. Olsen Canada
Anne Forrest relative to Paul A. Hagstrom United States Paul A. Hagstrom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.2×
Paul A. Hagstrom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Forrest

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Forrest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Forrest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Forrest more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Forrest

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Forrest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Forrest. The network helps show where Anne Forrest may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Anne Forrest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Forrest Line = papers co-authored together Anne Forrest links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 198886
2 200744
3 201540
4 200523
5 199318
6 202216
7 200214
8
What Do Women Want from Union Representation
20005
9 19895
10 20225
11 20055
12
The Industrial Relations Significance of Unpaid Work
19984
13 20054
14 19964
15 20053
16 20073
17
Hidden in the Past: How Labour Relations Policy and Law Perpetuate Women's Economic Inequality
20041
18 20101
19 20041
20
Connecting Women with Unions: What are the Issues?
20011

About Anne Forrest

Anne Forrest is a scholar working on Public Administration, Gender Studies, Strategy and Management, General Health Professions and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 20 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (11 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (2 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper), Occupational Health and Safety Research (1 paper) and Quality and Management Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (65 citations), General Decision Sciences (27 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (39 citations), Gender Studies (72 citations) and Health (35 citations). Anne Forrest has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wesley A. Magat, W. Kip Viscusi, Charlene Y. Senn, Alan Hall, Alan Sears, Nicole K. Jeffrey and Renée S. Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as Relations industrielles, Journal of Management Development, Labour / Le Travail, Psychology of Violence and Science & Justice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact