Anne Barzel

33 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Anne Barzel
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Rehabilitation 154
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 18
  • Neurology 29
  • Neurology 42
Replace Esme Worthington with:
Esme Worthington United Kingdom
Birgit Schuback Belgium
Luisa Cacciante Italy
Catherine Vass United Kingdom
Tomoko Ohura Japan
Sara Laxe Spain
Chiara Pagliari Italy
Jen-Wen Hung Taiwan
Nildo Manoel da Silva Ribeiro Brazil
Matthew B. Downer Canada
Anne Barzel relative to Esme Worthington United Kingdom Esme Worthington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Esme Worthington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Barzel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Barzel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Barzel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Barzel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Barzel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Barzel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Barzel. The network helps show where Anne Barzel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Barzel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Barzel Line = papers co-authored together Anne Barzel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201569
2 202048
3 201335
4 200631
5 200923
6 201322
7 200820
8 201914
9 200813
10 202013
11 201013
12 201810
13 20199
14 20227
15 20227
16 20186
17 20234
18
Erste deutschlandweite Befragung von Physio- und Ergotherapeuten zur Berufssituation - Teil 1: Profil der Teilnehmer (Basisdaten)
20114
19 20234
20 20144

About Anne Barzel

Anne Barzel is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, General Health Professions, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 36 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers), Health and Medical Studies (6 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (2 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers) and Education Methods and Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (154 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (18 citations), Neurology (29 citations) and Neurology (42 citations). Anne Barzel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Hendrik van den Bussche, Martin Scherer, Gesche Ketels, Christine Kersting, Britta Tetzlaff, Anne Stark, Karl Wegscheider, Joachim Liepert, Cornelius Weiller and Anne Daubmann. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, Trials, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychology and Clinical Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact