Annalee Newitz
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Japanese History and Culture
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
- Asian Culture and Media Studies
-
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Asian Culture and Media Studies 2
- Japanese History and Culture 2
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis 1
-
- Media, Gender, and Advertising 2
- Co-authors
- Matt Wray (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Film Quarterly (2 papers)Minnesota Review (1 paper)Social Text (1 paper)The New Scientist (17 papers)American studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Annalee Newitz
19 papers receiving 83 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Cultural Studies 41
- Gender Studies 18
- Literature and Literary Theory 20
- Philosophy 17
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 7
Countries citing papers authored by Annalee Newitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Annalee Newitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annalee Newitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annalee Newitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annalee Newitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annalee Newitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annalee Newitz. The network helps show where Annalee Newitz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Annalee Newitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 5 | What is "White Trash"?: Stereotypes and Economic Conditions of Poor Whites in the U.S. | 1996 | 11 |
| 6 | 1995 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 12 | ER, Professionals, and the Work-Family Disaster | 1998 | 1 |
| 13 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2006 | 1 |
About Annalee Newitz
Annalee Newitz is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 25 papers that have together received 124 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Culture and Media Studies (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers), Japanese History and Culture (2 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (1 paper), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (1 paper), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (1 paper) and Modern American Literature Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (41 citations), Gender Studies (18 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations), Philosophy (17 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (7 citations). Annalee Newitz has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Matt Wray. Their work appears in journals such as Film Quarterly, Minnesota Review, Social Text, The New Scientist and American studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.