Annabel Spek

428 citations
28 papers · 303 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Annabel Spek

27 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

Annabel Spek
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 52
  • Urology 37
  • Reproductive Medicine 40
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 91
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 106
Replace Hirotaka Akita with:
Hirotaka Akita Japan
Vlad Bura Romania
Jessica Thomas Australia
A. Bleuzen France
Krzysztof Tupikowski Poland
Winnie Y. Hahn United States
Marco Femia Italy
Antonio Brescia Italy
RA Filly United States
Annabel Spek relative to Hirotaka Akita Japan Hirotaka Akita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Hirotaka Akita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annabel Spek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annabel Spek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabel Spek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabel Spek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annabel Spek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabel Spek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabel Spek. The network helps show where Annabel Spek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annabel Spek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annabel Spek Line = papers co-authored together Annabel Spek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201969
2 201158
3 201641
4 202038
5 202117
6 202013
7 202012
8 201810
9 20226
10 20186
11 20195
12 20253
13 20173
14 20153
15 20192
16 20192
17 20162
18 20172
19 20202
20 20202

About Annabel Spek

Annabel Spek is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Urology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 28 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal cell carcinoma treatment (10 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Renal and related cancers (6 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (6 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (52 citations), Urology (37 citations), Reproductive Medicine (40 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (91 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (106 citations). Annabel Spek has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christian G. Stief, Michael Staehler, Anno Graser, Jozefina Casuscelli, Frank Strittmatter, Alexander Büchner, Julian Marcon, Johannes Rübenthaler, Maximilian F. Reiser and David Horst. Their work appears in journals such as Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology, The Prostate, British journal of surgery and British Journal of Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact