Tze-ki Hon
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Japanese History and Culture
-
- Philippine History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 25
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 3
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics 2
-
- Japanese History and Culture 10
- Cultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections 1
- Co-authors
- Geoffrey P. Redmond (1 shared paper)Yun Chen (1 shared paper)Chih‐yu Shih (1 shared paper)Wenyu Xie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Modern China (4 papers)Monumenta Serica (4 papers)The Journal of Asian Studies (2 papers)Inter-Asia Cultural Studies (1 paper)Dao (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong KongChina
In The Last Decade
Tze-ki Hon
32 papers receiving 98 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Cultural Studies 41
- Anthropology 26
- General Psychology 3
- Sociology and Political Science 102
- History and Philosophy of Science 6
Countries citing papers authored by Tze-ki Hon
This map shows the geographic impact of Tze-ki Hon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tze-ki Hon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tze-ki Hon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tze-ki Hon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tze-ki Hon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tze-ki Hon. The network helps show where Tze-ki Hon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Tze-ki Hon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 11 | |
| 4 | Revolution as Restoration: Guocui xuebao and China's Path to Modernity, 1905-1911 | 2013 | 10 |
| 5 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 8 | The Allure of the Nation: The Cultural and Historical Debates in Late Qing and Republican China | 2015 | 5 |
| 9 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 16 | Classical exegesis and social change: The song school of Yijing commentaries in late imperial China | 2011 | 2 |
| 17 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 2 |
About Tze-ki Hon
Tze-ki Hon is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and History, having authored 39 papers that have together received 129 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (25 papers), Japanese History and Culture (10 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (2 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (1 paper), Cultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections (1 paper) and Education, Leadership, and Health Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (41 citations), Anthropology (26 citations), General Psychology (3 citations), Sociology and Political Science (102 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (6 citations). Tze-ki Hon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey P. Redmond, Yun Chen, Chih‐yu Shih and Wenyu Xie. Their work appears in journals such as Modern China, Monumenta Serica, The Journal of Asian Studies, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies and Dao.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.