Tze-ki Hon
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Japanese History and Culture
- Anthropology top 10%
- Philippine History and Culture
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 37
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics 4
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 4
- Socioeconomic Development in Asia 2
-
- Japanese History and Culture 13
- Asian Culture and Media Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Geoffrey P. Redmond (1 shared paper)Wenyu Xie (1 shared paper)Chih‐yu Shih (1 shared paper)Yun Chen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Modern China (4 papers)Monumenta Serica (4 papers)The Journal of Asian Studies (2 papers)China Perspectives (1 paper)Dao (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong KongChina
In The Last Decade
Tze-ki Hon
45 papers receiving 135 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Cultural Studies 62
- Anthropology 37
- Sociology and Political Science 153
- General Psychology 3
- Religious studies 11
Countries citing papers authored by Tze-ki Hon
This map shows the geographic impact of Tze-ki Hon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tze-ki Hon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tze-ki Hon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tze-ki Hon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tze-ki Hon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tze-ki Hon. The network helps show where Tze-ki Hon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Tze-ki Hon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 5 | Revolution as Restoration: Guocui xuebao and China's Path to Modernity, 1905-1911 | 2013 | 10 |
| 6 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 13 | The Allure of the Nation: The Cultural and Historical Debates in Late Qing and Republican China | 2015 | 5 |
| 14 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 17 | Classical exegesis and social change: The song school of Yijing commentaries in late imperial China | 2011 | 3 |
| 18 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 3 |
About Tze-ki Hon
Tze-ki Hon is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy, having authored 60 papers that have together received 187 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (37 papers), Japanese History and Culture (13 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (4 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (62 citations), Anthropology (37 citations), Sociology and Political Science (153 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and Religious studies (11 citations). Tze-ki Hon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Geoffrey P. Redmond, Wenyu Xie, Chih‐yu Shih and Yun Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Modern China, Monumenta Serica, The Journal of Asian Studies, China Perspectives and Dao.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.