Anna Scott
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
Papers in
-
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 3
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 2
- Forest Management and Policy 2
-
- Plant and animal studies 3
- Co-authors
- S. POTTS (5 shared papers)Graham N. Stone (3 shared papers)Lynne M. Osgathorpe (3 shared papers)Nadine Mitschunas (3 shared papers)Jane Memmott (3 shared papers)Mark A. Goddard (3 shared papers)Katherine C. R. Baldock (3 shared papers)Damien M. Hicks (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biodiversity and Conservation (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)Global Ecology and Biogeography (1 paper)Nature Ecology & Evolution (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGreecePoland
In The Last Decade
Anna Scott
7 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Anna Scott's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 951
- Insect Science 452
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 424
- Ecological Modeling 123
- Plant Science 527
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Scott. The network helps show where Anna Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 511 |
| 2 | A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 386 |
| 3 | 2016 | 281 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 7 | Corporate implications of longer lives | 2017 | 14 |
About Anna Scott
Anna Scott is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Insect Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (1 paper) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (951 citations), Insect Science (452 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (424 citations), Ecological Modeling (123 citations) and Plant Science (527 citations). Anna Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Greece and Poland. Frequent co-authors include S. POTTS, Graham N. Stone, Lynne M. Osgathorpe, Nadine Mitschunas, Jane Memmott, Mark A. Goddard, Katherine C. R. Baldock, Damien M. Hicks, William E. Kunin and Ian P. Vaughan. Their work appears in journals such as Biodiversity and Conservation, PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Global Ecology and Biogeography and Nature Ecology & Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.