S. POTTS
Impact in
- Insect Science top 0.01%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 192
- Insect Science 117
- Insect and Pesticide Research 100
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 21
- Co-authors
- Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer (27 shared papers)William E. Kunin (23 shared papers)Peter Mark Neumann (6 shared papers)Oliver Schweiger (11 shared papers)Claire Kremen (3 shared papers)Riccardo Bommarco (25 shared papers)Stuart P. M. Roberts (43 shared papers)David Kleijn (21 shared papers)
- Journals
- Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (22 papers)Journal of Applied Ecology (11 papers)PLoS ONE (9 papers)Biological Conservation (8 papers)Basic and Applied Ecology (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
S. POTTS
241 papers receiving 30.9k citations
S. POTTS's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
- Insect Science 16.4k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 24.5k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 8.2k
- Ecological Modeling 2.1k
- Genetics 9.1k
Countries citing papers authored by S. POTTS
This map shows the geographic impact of S. POTTS's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. POTTS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. POTTS more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by S. POTTS
This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. POTTS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. POTTS. The network helps show where S. POTTS may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. POTTS, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 245 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 4882 |
| 2 | Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 2493 |
| 3 | Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 1506 |
| 4 | Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 1387 |
| 5 | Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land‐use change Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1167 |
| 6 | Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 802 |
| 7 | MEASURING BEE DIVERSITY IN DIFFERENT EUROPEAN HABITATS AND BIOGEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 634 |
| 8 | Climate change impacts on bumblebees converge across continents Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 626 |
| 9 | LINKING BEES AND FLOWERS: HOW DO FLORAL COMMUNITIES STRUCTURE POLLINATOR COMMUNITIES? Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 620 |
| 10 | Ecological and life-history traits predict bee species responses to environmental disturbances Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 589 |
| 11 | Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 561 |
| 12 | Declines of managed honey bees and beekeepers in Europe Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 525 |
| 13 | Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 511 |
| 14 | 2005 | 438 | |
| 15 | Ecological Intensification: Bridging the Gap between Science and Practice Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 415 |
| 16 | Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri‐environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss – a meta‐analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 408 |
| 17 | A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 386 |
| 18 | 2005 | 355 | |
| 19 | A restatement of the natural science evidence base concerning neonicotinoid insecticides and insect pollinators Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 349 |
| 20 | 2009 | 343 |
About S. POTTS
S. POTTS is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 245 papers that have together received 32.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (192 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (100 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (83 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (68 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (67 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (21 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (16.4k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (24.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (8.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (2.1k citations) and Genetics (9.1k citations). S. POTTS has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer, William E. Kunin, Peter Mark Neumann, Oliver Schweiger, Claire Kremen, Riccardo Bommarco, Stuart P. M. Roberts, David Kleijn, Josef Settele and Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter. Their work appears in journals such as Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Journal of Applied Ecology, PLoS ONE, Biological Conservation and Basic and Applied Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.