Anna Phillips

31 papers receiving 917 citations

Peers

Anna Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 194
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 89
  • Physiology 188
  • General Health Professions 159
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 25
Replace Mu‐Hsing Ho with:
Mu‐Hsing Ho Hong Kong
Jane Smith United Kingdom
Lucia Siegel Sommers United States
Jita G. Hoogerduijn Netherlands
Kylie Johnston Australia
Eduardo José Ferreira Santos Portugal
Reena Karani United States
Einav Srulovici Israel
Tanya Mailhot Canada
Natasha Kareem Brusco Australia
Anna Phillips relative to Mu‐Hsing Ho Hong Kong Mu‐Hsing Ho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17×
Mu‐Hsing Ho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Phillips. The network helps show where Anna Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Anna Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016221
2 2004118
3 201778
4 200363
5 201748
6 202045
7 201440
8 201739
9 200438
10 201437
11 201332
12 201331
13 201722
14 201721
15 202116
16 201715
17 200614
18 202114
19 202413
20 202111

About Anna Phillips

Anna Phillips is a scholar working on Physiology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 975 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (9 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (194 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (89 citations), Physiology (188 citations), General Health Professions (159 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (25 citations). Anna Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kathy R. Stiller, Lucy Kate Lewis, Marie Williams, Kylie Johnston, Paul Glasziou, Maureen Patricia McEvoy, Julie K. Tilson, David Moher, James Galipeau and Claire E. Baldwin. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, Physical Therapy, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact