Anna Phan

1.8k citations
24 papers · 1.3k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Phan

24 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Anna Phan
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 355
  • Social Psychology 542
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 348
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 109
  • Genetics 441
Replace Agnès Lacreuse with:
Agnès Lacreuse United States
Sergei A. Musatov United States
Johnny S.W. Chan United States
Marianne L. Seney United States
John Meitzen United States
Melody V. Wu United States
Clarissa C. Parker United States
Maureen P. Boyle United States
Stephen Clark Maxson United States
Ceylan Isgor United States
Anna Phan relative to Agnès Lacreuse United States Agnès Lacreuse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Agnès Lacreuse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Phan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Phan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Phan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Phan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Phan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Phan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Phan. The network helps show where Anna Phan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Phan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Phan Line = papers co-authored together Anna Phan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011180
2 2009166
3 2011144
4 2012122
5 201591
6 201590
7 201877
8 201375
9 201269
10 201760
11 201147
12 201345
13 202135
14 201234
15 201427
16
Estrogen receptor beta agonists in neurobehavioral investigations.
200823
17 200812
18 201411
19 20168
20 20187

About Anna Phan

Anna Phan is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Genetics and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (8 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (3 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (355 citations), Social Psychology (542 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (348 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (109 citations) and Genetics (441 citations). Anna Phan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Elena Choleris, Amy E. Clipperton‐Allen, Martin Kavaliers, Neil James MacLusky, Ronald L. Davis, John N. Armstrong, Donald W. Pfaff, Jennifer Lymer, Jacob A. Berry and Isaac Cervantes-Sandoval. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, eLife, Physiology & Behavior and Journal of Neuroendocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact