Anna Panzeri

1.0k citations
34 papers · 593 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Panzeri

29 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers

Anna Panzeri
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Clinical Psychology 365
  • Applied Psychology 63
  • Health 78
  • Social Psychology 175
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 37
Replace Santo Imanuel Tonapa with:
Santo Imanuel Tonapa Taiwan
Ana Querido Portugal
Hui Lin Ong Singapore
Alicia Krikorian Colombia
Ana Lúcia Siqueira Costa Brazil
Joaquín Salvador Lima‐Rodríguez Spain
Sylvie Lauzon Canada
Katherine Marx United States
Dauda Salihu Nigeria
Gayle Roux United States
Anna Panzeri relative to Santo Imanuel Tonapa Taiwan Santo Imanuel Tonapa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.6×
Santo Imanuel Tonapa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Panzeri

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Panzeri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Panzeri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Panzeri more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Panzeri

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Panzeri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Panzeri. The network helps show where Anna Panzeri may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Panzeri, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Panzeri Line = papers co-authored together Anna Panzeri links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020129
2 201961
3 202160
4 202137
5 202232
6 202031
7 201925
8 202121
9 202020
10 202019
11 202219
12 201917
13 202117
14 202117
15 202413
16 202213
17
Supporting rehabilitation patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic: Experiences from a technologybased psychological approach
202013
18 20248
19 20238
20 20228

About Anna Panzeri

Anna Panzeri is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 and Mental Health (11 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (365 citations), Applied Psychology (63 citations), Health (78 citations), Social Psychology (175 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (37 citations). Anna Panzeri has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Silvia Rossi Ferrario, Giulio Vidotto, Stefania Mannarini, Alessandro Rossi, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Gian Mauro Manzoni, Giada Pietrabissa, Andrea Spoto, Marco Bertamini and Massimo Pistono. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Artificial Organs, BMC Psychology, PLoS ONE and European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact