Ana Querido

3.2k citations
95 papers · 748 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Ana Querido

84 papers receiving 699 citations

Peers

Ana Querido
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Applied Psychology 85
  • Clinical Psychology 251
  • Health 77
  • General Health Professions 183
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 37
Replace Carlos Laranjeira with:
Carlos Laranjeira Portugal
Janet Landeen Canada
Lars Johan Danbolt Norway
Kjell Kristoffersen Norway
Katherine Joekes United Kingdom
Lisbet Lindholm Finland
Emily J. Hauenstein United States
Alicia Krikorian Colombia
Sophie Lelorain France
Gayle Roux United States
Ana Querido relative to Carlos Laranjeira Portugal Carlos Laranjeira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Carlos Laranjeira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ana Querido

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ana Querido's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ana Querido with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ana Querido more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ana Querido

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ana Querido. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ana Querido. The network helps show where Ana Querido may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ana Querido, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ana Querido Line = papers co-authored together Ana Querido links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201968
2 195968
3 202250
4 202236
5 202125
6 202224
7 202321
8 202119
9 202219
10 202017
11 202216
12 202015
13 202214
14 202114
15 202314
16 202213
17 202112
18 202111
19 202410
20 202210

About Ana Querido

Ana Querido is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 95 papers that have together received 748 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (25 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (19 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (11 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (9 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (8 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (7 papers), Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (7 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (85 citations), Clinical Psychology (251 citations), Health (77 citations), General Health Professions (183 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (37 citations). Ana Querido has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carlos Laranjeira, Maria dos Anjos Dixe, Zaida Charepe, Roberta Frontini, Olga Valentim, Teresa Peralta, Catarina Tomás, João Gomes, Henk Verloo and Filipa Pereira. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychology, European Psychiatry, Acta Paulista de Enfermagem and Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact