Steven Knapp
Impact in
-
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Philosophy top 5%
- Rhetoric and Communication Studies
Papers in
-
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 2
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 1
-
- Law, Rights, and Freedoms 1
- Co-authors
- Walter Benn Michaels (8 shared papers)Paul H. Fry (1 shared paper)Philip Clayton (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Critical Inquiry (4 papers)MLN (1 paper)New Literary History (1 paper)American Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Representations (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Steven Knapp
16 papers receiving 118 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Literature and Literary Theory 81
- Philosophy 68
- Classics 17
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 20
- Anthropology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Steven Knapp
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Knapp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Knapp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Knapp. The network helps show where Steven Knapp may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Steven Knapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Literary Interest: The Limits of Anti-Formalism | 1993 | 63 |
| 2 | 1987 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 60 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1983 | 13 | |
| 6 | Not a Matter of Interpretation | 2005 | 9 |
| 7 | Ethics and rationality | 1993 | 4 |
| 8 | The impossibility of intentionless meaning | 1992 | 4 |
| 9 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 11 | Against Theory 2: Sentence Meaning, Hermeneutics : Protocol of the Fifty-Second Colloquy, 8 December 1985 | 1986 | 2 |
| 12 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 1 |
About Steven Knapp
Steven Knapp is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (2 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (1 paper), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (1 paper) and Law in Society and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (81 citations), Philosophy (68 citations), Classics (17 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (20 citations) and Anthropology (32 citations). Steven Knapp has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Walter Benn Michaels, Paul H. Fry and Philip Clayton. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Inquiry, MLN, New Literary History, American Philosophical Quarterly and Representations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.