Anna Omery

971 citations
33 papers · 709 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Omery

33 papers receiving 612 citations

Peers

Anna Omery
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Research and Theory 62
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 48
  • General Health Professions 288
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 55
  • Leadership and Management 8
Replace Susan Procter with:
Susan Procter United Kingdom
Shigeko Izumi United States
Marilyn A. Ray United States
Cheryle Moss Australia
Stefanos Mantzoukas Greece
Laurel E. Radwin United States
Sarah Winch Australia
Jayne Cohen United States
Alice Kiger United Kingdom
Tony Butterworth United Kingdom
Anna Omery relative to Susan Procter United Kingdom Susan Procter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Susan Procter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Omery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Omery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Omery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Omery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Omery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Omery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Omery. The network helps show where Anna Omery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Anna Omery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Omery Line = papers co-authored together Anna Omery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983292
2 199936
3 201234
4 201028
5 201926
6
Values, moral reasoning, and ethics.
198926
7 199524
8 201222
9 199520
10 201919
11 200318
12 200217
13 200215
14 201715
15 200314
16 201414
17 198312
18 20029
19 19969
20 19907

About Anna Omery

Anna Omery is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Clinical Psychology and Research and Theory, having authored 33 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers) and Health and Wellbeing Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (62 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (48 citations), General Health Professions (288 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (55 citations) and Leadership and Management (8 citations). Anna Omery has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Ecuador. Frequent co-authors include Cecelia L. Crawford, Ann M. Mayo, Betty L. Chang, Jean Ann Seago, Kristen R. Choi, June Rondinelli, Christine E. Kasper, Gayle G. Page, Joan M. Riley and Elizabeth A. Henneman. Their work appears in journals such as JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Advances in Nursing Science, The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Nursing Administration Quarterly and Clinical Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact