Anna Münster

19 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Anna Münster
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 41
  • Human-Computer Interaction 35
  • Museology 17
  • Computer Science Applications 25
  • Communication 31
Replace Bernhard Siegert with:
Bernhard Siegert Germany
N. Katherine Hayles
Laurence Raw Türkiye
Nancy Roth United States
Andrew Murphie Australia
Erhard Schüttpelz Germany
Eitan Wilf Israel
Alberto Manguel United States
Grant Bollmer United States
Joel Snyder United States
Anna Münster relative to Bernhard Siegert Germany Bernhard Siegert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Bernhard Siegert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Münster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Münster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Münster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Münster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Münster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Münster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Münster. The network helps show where Anna Münster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Anna Münster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Münster Line = papers co-authored together Anna Münster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Materializing New Media: Embodiment in Information Aesthetics
200686
2 201966
3 201349
4
An Aesthesia of Networks: Conjunctive Experience in Art and Technology
201325
5 199914
6 201411
7
Materializing New Media: Embodiment in Information Aesthetics (Interfaces: Studies in Visual Culture)
20068
8 20117
9 20234
10 20213
11 20093
12
Digitality: Approximate Aesthetics
20012
13
Why Is BioArt Not Terrorism?: Some Critical Nodes inthe Networks of Infomatice Life
20042
14 20132
15 20212
16 19991
17
Biopolitics, For Now
20041
18 20241
19 20081
20 20181

About Anna Münster

Anna Münster is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Clinical Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Education, having authored 25 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (2 papers), Art, Technology, and Culture (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers), Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (1 paper), Digital Media and Visual Art (1 paper) and Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (41 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (35 citations), Museology (17 citations), Computer Science Applications (25 citations) and Communication (31 citations). Anna Münster has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Mackenzie, Michael Richardson, Liam Magee, Melinda Cooper, Andrew Goffey and Ned Rossiter. Their work appears in journals such as Theory Culture & Society, Continuum, AI & Society, Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies and Australian Feminist Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact