Anna M. Button

38 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Anna M. Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 58
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 107
  • Physiology 328
  • Cancer Research 161
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 170
Replace Hiroji Uemura with:
Hiroji Uemura Japan
Ming‐Kuen Lai Taiwan
Yasuhide Miyoshi Japan
Alejandra Romero Spain
Hyuk‐Joon Lee South Korea
George Bayliss United States
Minàko Kobayashi Japan
Tomohiro F. Nishijima Japan
Hayato Yamamoto Japan
Jérôme Alexandre France
Anna M. Button relative to Hiroji Uemura Japan Hiroji Uemura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Hiroji Uemura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Button. The network helps show where Anna M. Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna M. Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna M. Button Line = papers co-authored together Anna M. Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014228
2 2013191
3 201199
4 201593
5 201284
6 201369
7 201563
8 201461
9 201453
10 201552
11 201442
12 201441
13 201435
14 201533
15 201628
16 201326
17 201426
18 201323
19 201222
20 201322

About Anna M. Button

Anna M. Button is a scholar working on Oncology, Reproductive Medicine, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (3 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (58 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (107 citations), Physiology (328 citations), Cancer Research (161 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (170 citations). Anna M. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include James J. Mezhir, Sarah L. Mott, John M. Buatti, Aeen Asghar, Sudershan K. Bhatia, Benjamin Johnson, E. J. Clark, S. Joglekar, Douglas R. Spitz and Bryan G. Allen. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Surgical Oncology and Clinical Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact