Anna Kwa

642 citations
16 papers · 321 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Kwa

15 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Anna Kwa
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 136
  • Atmospheric Science 158
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 113
  • Global and Planetary Change 132
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 25
Replace Atri Deshamukhya with:
Atri Deshamukhya India
Mark R. Dubal United Kingdom
Michele Ronco Italy
Lihua Ma China
J. Marshall United Kingdom
M. Rockenbach Brazil
Phil Perillat United States
Aronne Merrelli United States
M. Losada Colombia
Anna Kwa relative to Atri Deshamukhya India Atri Deshamukhya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Atri Deshamukhya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Kwa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Kwa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Kwa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Kwa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Kwa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Kwa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Kwa. The network helps show where Anna Kwa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Anna Kwa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Kwa Line = papers co-authored together Anna Kwa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201666
2 202160
3 202244
4 201532
5 201624
6 202219
7 202312
8 202112
9 202512
10 201711
11 202410
12 20187
13 20235
14 20245
15 20182
16 20250

About Anna Kwa

Anna Kwa is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 16 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (10 papers), Climate variability and models (9 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (6 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (3 papers), Computational Physics and Python Applications (2 papers), Precipitation Measurement and Analysis (2 papers) and Cryospheric studies and observations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (136 citations), Atmospheric Science (158 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (113 citations), Global and Planetary Change (132 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (25 citations). Anna Kwa has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Manoj Kaplinghat, Brian Henn, Christopher S. Bretherton, W. A. Perkins, Oliver Watt‐Meyer, Jeremy McGibbon, Spencer K. Clark, Noah Brenowitz, Annika H. G. Peter and Kimberly K. Boddy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Physical review. D, Geophysical Research Letters, Geoscientific model development and npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact