Anna E. Kornadt

67 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Anna E. Kornadt
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 1.2k
  • Health 391
  • Applied Psychology 232
  • Demography 355
  • Social Psychology 553
Replace Dana Kotter‐Grühn with:
Dana Kotter‐Grühn United States
Hannah J. Swift United Kingdom
Eva‐Marie Kessler Germany
Ruth A. Lamont United Kingdom
Gary D. Stockdale United States
Gloria Luong United States
Jaye L. Shaner United States
Helen Q. Kivnick United States
Nan Stevens Netherlands
William L. Gekoski Canada
Anna E. Kornadt relative to Dana Kotter‐Grühn United States Dana Kotter‐Grühn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dana Kotter‐Grühn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna E. Kornadt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna E. Kornadt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna E. Kornadt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna E. Kornadt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna E. Kornadt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna E. Kornadt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna E. Kornadt. The network helps show where Anna E. Kornadt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna E. Kornadt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna E. Kornadt Line = papers co-authored together Anna E. Kornadt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011195
2 2017190
3 2015181
4 2011115
5 201995
6 201482
7 201475
8 202057
9 201656
10 201555
11 201553
12 201349
13 201347
14 201843
15 201643
16 202142
17 201838
18 201936
19 201634
20 201932

About Anna E. Kornadt

Anna E. Kornadt is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (54 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (20 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (12 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (10 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (9 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (7 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (5 papers) and Retirement, Disability, and Employment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (1.2k citations), Health (391 citations), Applied Psychology (232 citations), Demography (355 citations) and Social Psychology (553 citations). Anna E. Kornadt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Luxembourg and United States. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Rothermund, Peggy Voß, Hans‐Werner Wahl, Yannick Stéphan, Dana Kotter‐Grühn, Susanne Wurm, Manfred Diehl, Thomas M. Hess, Christian Kandler and Gerben J. Westerhof. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Aging, European Journal of Ageing, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Innovation in Aging and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact