Anna E. Janecka

5.2k citations
211 papers · 4.5k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Anna E. Janecka

209 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Anna E. Janecka
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.4k
  • Toxicology 186
  • Organic Chemistry 747
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 141
  • Cancer Research 255
Replace Stephen M. Husbands with:
Stephen M. Husbands United Kingdom
Andrew Coop United States
Jun‐Xu Li United States
Walter G. Schunack Germany
Thomas Edward Prisinzano United States
Harald Hübner Germany
P. Dostert Japan
D. Euan MacIntyre United States
Ruth A. Ross United Kingdom
Anna E. Janecka relative to Stephen M. Husbands United Kingdom Stephen M. Husbands's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.1×
Stephen M. Husbands · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna E. Janecka

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna E. Janecka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna E. Janecka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna E. Janecka more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna E. Janecka

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna E. Janecka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna E. Janecka. The network helps show where Anna E. Janecka may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna E. Janecka, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna E. Janecka Line = papers co-authored together Anna E. Janecka links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 211 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004238
2 2007201
3 2013175
4 2012154
5 2011115
6 2002112
7 2005104
8 2020101
9 201595
10 201275
11 200174
12 199172
13 200871
14 200869
15 201166
16 200964
17
Substance P: transmitter of nociception (Minireview).
200062
18 200853
19 201650
20 201049

About Anna E. Janecka

Anna E. Janecka is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Physiology, having authored 211 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (106 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (40 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (35 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (17 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (12 papers), Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (9 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (7 papers) and Organoselenium and organotellurium chemistry (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Toxicology (186 citations), Organic Chemistry (747 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (141 citations) and Cancer Research (255 citations). Anna E. Janecka has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jakub Fichna, Katarzyna Gach, Tomasz Janecki, Maria Zubrzycka, Jean-Claude do-Rego, Anna Wyrębska, Angelika Długosz-Pokorska, Jean Costentin, Renata Perlikowska and Urszula Krajewska. Their work appears in journals such as Peptides, Molecules, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, Brain Research and European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact