Anna E. Hills

9 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Anna E. Hills
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 172
  • Biotechnology 50
  • Molecular Biology 351
  • Biochemistry 16
  • Immunology 45
Replace Erzsébet Fellinger with:
Erzsébet Fellinger Hungary
Donald O. O'Keefe United States
Michael Forstner Switzerland
Evelina F. Edelweiss France
Markus Kaufmann Switzerland
Gregor Ilc Slovenia
Robert J. Hoey United States
Sandra M. Maier Germany
Tam M. Pham Australia
Tünde Juhász Hungary
Anna E. Hills relative to Erzsébet Fellinger Hungary Erzsébet Fellinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Erzsébet Fellinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna E. Hills

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna E. Hills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna E. Hills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna E. Hills more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna E. Hills

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna E. Hills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna E. Hills. The network helps show where Anna E. Hills may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna E. Hills, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna E. Hills Line = papers co-authored together Anna E. Hills links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2001149
2 2001105
3 199875
4
American Biotechnology Laboratory
200258
5 201141
6 200826
7 201022
8 20227
9
Chemical and biological characterisation of a sensor surface for bioprocess monitoring
20101
10 20080

About Anna E. Hills

Anna E. Hills is a scholar working on Bioengineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Immunology and Physiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (2 papers), Galectins and Cancer Biology (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (2 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (172 citations), Biotechnology (50 citations), Molecular Biology (351 citations), Biochemistry (16 citations) and Immunology (45 citations). Anna E. Hills has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David C. James, Ashvin I Patel, M. Hoare, Robert B. Freedman, Delores C.S. James, Paulina D. Rakowska, Eleonora Cerasoli, Jay M. Baraban, Lee L. Rubin and Khalequz Zaman. Their work appears in journals such as Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Animal Behaviour, European Biophysics Journal and Biologicals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact