Anna Demurtas
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Genetics top 10%
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Papers in
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment 8
- Genetics 7
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research 4
- Co-authors
- Alessandra Stacchini (16 shared papers)Sabrina Aliberti (14 shared papers)Domenico Novero (9 shared papers)Laura Godio (5 shared papers)Sara Nicoli (7 shared papers)Cristina Padula (7 shared papers)Silvia Pescina (6 shared papers)Patrizia Santi (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry (5 papers)American Journal of Clinical Pathology (3 papers)Pharmaceutics (2 papers)Acta Cytologica (2 papers)Current Protocols in Cytometry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ItalyBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anna Demurtas
27 papers receiving 467 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 142
- Genetics 72
- Periodontics 27
- Dermatology 42
- Pharmaceutical Science 26
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Demurtas
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Demurtas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Demurtas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Demurtas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Demurtas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Demurtas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Demurtas. The network helps show where Anna Demurtas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Demurtas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 6 |
About Anna Demurtas
Anna Demurtas is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Dermatology, Pharmaceutical Science and Oncology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery (4 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (4 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (4 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (142 citations), Genetics (72 citations), Periodontics (27 citations), Dermatology (42 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (26 citations). Anna Demurtas has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alessandra Stacchini, Sabrina Aliberti, Domenico Novero, Laura Godio, Sara Nicoli, Cristina Padula, Silvia Pescina, Patrizia Santi, Paola Francia di Celle and Giorgio Palestro. Their work appears in journals such as Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Pharmaceutics, Acta Cytologica and Current Protocols in Cytometry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.