Anna Crane

433 citations
11 papers · 336 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

    • Eating Disorders and Behaviors 3
    • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 2
    • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 1
  • Law 1
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies 1

Anna Crane

11 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Anna Crane
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Clinical Psychology 294
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 71
  • Pharmacy 14
  • Applied Psychology 9
  • Sociology and Political Science 43
Replace Inger Halvorsen with:
Inger Halvorsen Norway
Anna Lose United Kingdom
Pam Macdonald United Kingdom
Simone Raenker United Kingdom
Nola Rushford Australia
Maddalena Conti Italy
Tatiana Zanetti Italy
Kathryn J. Zerbe United States
Ida F. Dancyger United States
Nadia Delsedime Italy
Anna Crane relative to Inger Halvorsen Norway Inger Halvorsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Inger Halvorsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Crane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Crane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Crane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Crane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Crane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Crane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Crane. The network helps show where Anna Crane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Anna Crane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Crane Line = papers co-authored together Anna Crane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2007125
2 200778
3 201171
4 201638
5
Skills-based Caring for a Loved One with an Eating Disorder: The New Maudsley Method
201615
6 19833
7 20092
8 20231
9 20231
10 20201
11 20101

About Anna Crane

Anna Crane is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Law, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (1 paper), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 paper), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (1 paper), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (294 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (71 citations), Pharmacy (14 citations), Applied Psychology (9 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (43 citations). Anna Crane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Janet L. Treasure, Gráinne Smith, Marion Roberts, Rebecca F. McKnight, Melissa Joy Wolfe, Raymond L. Blakley, Charles M. Baugh, James Gossage, Robin Som and Paul Harold Rowe. Their work appears in journals such as Pragmatics & Cognition, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Advances in experimental medicine and biology, International Journal of Surgery and European Eating Disorders Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact